|
Currently only a
few people oppose all war. For most Americans, war can
be either just or unjust. For these Americans, a just war does
not warrant opposition in the same way that unjust war does.
A war of defense is generally considered more just than is
a war of aggression.
The government lied
about its reasons for going to war. Saddam Hussein was a brutal
dictator who oppressed and exploited the Iraqi people, but
this did not mean that he was preparing to attack America.
When
he violated international law by invading another country,
the United Nations formed a coalition to remove Hussein's army
from Kuwait. That's because
the principle against countries invading other countries
was so strong as to require international action. But in the
most recent war Iraq did not invade another country. Instead,
America
did
- without the backing
of the United Nations.
The case for war
against Iraq was so weak that the United Nations did not buy
it, even after Colin Powell presented his government's reasons
for wanting to attack Iraq. Most of the world's governments
believed that there were other ways to prevent Hussein from
becoming a threat
to the stability of the Middle East.
But the United States
had other reasons for invading Iraq, so the fact that Hussein
was not behind the September 11th attacks did not matter. But
this does matter to the many Americans who are only willing
to kill and to die
to protect America. Americans should not be forced to fight
a war based on lies.
While
all Americans are morally and legally obligated to not
fight in an illegal war, the government does not recognize
this right. This means that the government does not consider
concerns over crimes against the peace as a valid basis
for gaining consciences objector status.
To
be considered a "legally recognized" conscientious
objector you must state that you are opposed to all
war, not just this war. more
|
Next: Freedom of life
|